Anna Ruman, MD
Resident in Pediatrics at Massachusetts General Hospital
PGY-3
01/21/2020
Anna Ruman, MD |
Last week, I participated in the value-based healthcare
delivery course for Partners trainees at Harvard Business School. I wanted to
reflect on a few key takeaways from the course as relevant to my own pediatrics
practice.
First, the idea of segmenting a heterogeneous patient
population into IPUs really resonated with me. I spent some time thinking about
how I would do that in a pediatric primary care practice. The goal would be to
cluster patients with similar medical or social conditions into certain clinic
slots – both temporally and physically – so as to provide a care experience
specific to these patient’s condition or needs. Some of the clusters that could
be easily imagined in primary care pediatrics would be: asthma, obesity,
behavioral health (or even subgroup further into ADHD), newborn, and other
medically complex. Having an asthma clinic twice per month would allow A) an
asthma educator’s time to be concentrated in a more cost effective way,
particularly if the educator is shared between health centers; B) a
pulmonologist to come for subspecialty clinic to the primary care site to see
patients – again, in a clustered, cost effective way; C) for multidisciplinary
obesity care to be organized around clinic afternoons specific designed for
obesity – nutrition, clinical psychologist, group visits, etc; D) for group
breastfeeding and lactation visits on newborn mornings; E) for appointment
slots to be longer for medically/social complex clinic sessions and perhaps
social work to be available; F) for embedded behavioral health visits/brief
substance use interventions/etc. to be available in a primary care clinic
session designed for ADHD management. Other efficiencies and benefits for
patients could easily be imagined and would allow clinics to improve delivery
of high quality healthcare, particularly through tracking outcomes for these
particular patient groups, at a lower cost.
Second, I’ve also been reflecting on the challenges of
placing value on different preventative health interventions, particularly
within pediatrics, as part of the larger questions of reimbursement and health
care provider compensation. According to our current model, we don’t place very
much value as a society on keeping children healthy. We don’t invest in cost-effective
interventions to raise children into healthy, economically productive adults.
Whether discussing pediatrician compensation, lack of access to early childhood
education, or comprehensive sex education and access to reproductive healthcare
for adolescents, our healthcare system operatives with such perverse
incentives. Adult providers (as well as hospitals and pharmaceutical companies)
take care of sicker patients at younger ages for higher compensation/reimbursement
if our society does a mediocre job at pediatric care. And I do feel that
pediatricians either are left out of or haven’t seized their place in many
healthcare policy discussions nationally. We take care of the most vulnerable
patients with the lowest reimbursement rates on average, and we deliver
tremendous value to the healthcare system and to society for every asthma
exacerbation prevented and every adolescent provided with comprehensive
substance use treatment. It’s time for pediatricians to be at the epicenter of
the value creation movement – we can provide incredible value to patients at
low cost to the system, and far past due for pediatric healthcare, whether
delivered by pediatricians or other providers, to be recognized by players
throughout our system as the way forward in building a healthier society.
Lastly, I’ve also realized that as a resident, I have taken
care of many high utilizers of pediatric healthcare, whether NICU babies or
children with complex medical conditions. One of my favorite parts of the
course was learning about CHOP’s home health network. As a pediatrician working
with home care companies, I would do anything for organizing high quality home
healthcare to be a more streamlined process that’s both better integrated with
EMR and more attentive to pediatric-specific home care needs. It would be
fascinating to study the Massachusetts pediatric home care market and see if
there would be an opportunity for a new entrant into that space – one of the
pediatric hospitals in the area, for example. If these kids have better access
to home care, particularly for basic labs, fluids, feeds, and medications, we
could prevent many hospital admissions and reduce costs for the care of this
population, thereby increasing value for patients and families.
I’m very appreciative for the opportunity to have
participated in this course, and I plan to integrate value based care into both
my current clinical practice and broader career objectives going forward. Thank
you again!
No comments:
Post a Comment