Junzi Shi, MD
Resident in BWH Radiology Diagnostic
PGY-5
02/17/2020
The 17th Annual Health Care Conference at Harvard Business School brings together students, industry and HBS Faculty. |
What are the next big trends in healthcare? Who
is going to take care of the elderly? How does gender disparity limit our
effectiveness? These are all questions that were discussed at the HBS annual
healthcare conference. The conference was organized by HBS students in the
Healthcare club. Attendees included HBS students, college students, along with
some representatives from industry, and most of the speakers were HBS alumni and
invited industry leaders.
The themes of the conference that struck me the
most include Javier Rodriguez’s concept of the “healthcare amoeba.” Just like
how a family may face decision quagmire when attempting to go out to dinner,
healthcare has many components that tend to go in different directions. Like an
amoeba, healthcare has components that are amorphous, ill-defined, with many
different needs and desires. Moreover, every patient is unique and has
different needs. So how do we address individual health better? The answer may
lie in figuring out a better healthcare delivery model.
Disruptive healthcare is different from general
parlance – it is being able to decentralize healthcare and still provide good
or better care. Perhaps delivering care in the home, adapted to an individual’s
needs, is arguably better than “one size fits all.” Is there a way to locally
manage care, and then scale that to reach more patients? There are thoughtful
questions that help us take the lessons learned from other industries such as
the automotive infrastructure to rethink healthcare. Uber and Lyft have
disrupted the taxi industry by decentralizing the service of giving rides,
better addressing needs by utilizing smaller pockets of resources (using your
own car) and better technology (an app to track the ride).
Another good model from industry is the airline
industry that has been able to streamline quality control and safety that far
outshines healthcare for decades. Perhaps what we need are “care traffic
controllers” to help manage all the moving pieces in the large healthcare
machinery. These are amongst the positive ideas that I took away, however there
were also unsettling narratives.
Quite a few speakers spoke about physicians as
if they were obstructive barriers to change as annoying weight: disruptive
change led by millennials vs the entrenched privileged class. Lauren Lisher
from Mount Sinai Health Partners spoke about finding the pain point in
discussions with orthopedic surgeons developing a bundled care package in order
to build common language, because “doctors don’t want to change.” The conversation
was how do we get the doctors to come around, or alternatively, how to achieve
our objective with...or without them. Start-ups look at population-wide health
problems in innovative ways that physicians focused on the day-to-day work may
be blind to. However, this does not mean that physicians do not want to change
and incorporate new ideas if they help patient outcomes. Physicians need to be
true partners in joint decision-making about healthcare innovation. I found the
negative attitude towards physicians to be unfortunately a common theme at
healthcare conferences, and this may guide business leaders to miss out on a
huge opportunity to engage physicians as shareholders. If you are hoping to
leader disruptive healthcare change, ask yourself, “Are business incentives actually
aligned with patient care?” Physicians are the on-ground experts who actually
do the work and we need to be both good stewards of our resources as well as
gatekeepers to patient care.
No comments:
Post a Comment