Mass General Brigham's Centers of Expertise (COEs) are innovative cross-specialty educational opportunities that allows trainees to explore areas of medicine and health care delivery relevant to all specialties such as medical education, quality & safety, global & community health, and health care policy & management. This blog is authored by trainees who have participated in the COEs and the impact of this participation.
Thursday, July 15, 2021
A New Lens.
Improving Quality and Value in Healthcare Delivery.
Matthew Joseph Best, M.D. |
COE Healthcare Policy Course Through HBS
A Valuable Perspective.
A Valuable Foundation.
Kelly M. Schuering, MD |
Though my focus has been primarily clinical to date, I know my desire to improve the flawed systems that I see failing patients will inevitably lead to administrative roles in the future. This course has helped prepare me to be a more effective agent in change in building a more efficient, but equitable health care system throughout my medical career as a primary care provider. Though it is just the beginning, this course laid a strong foundation upon which I can hope to build a career and a system that warrants it’s own case in the future! Thanks so much for such a transformative experience!
Friday, July 9, 2021
The Value Proposition of Standardized Care Processes
James C. Etheridge, M.D. |
Necessary for All Residents
Massachusetts General Hospital |
Terrific Course for thinking about health system strategy
Gregory James Zahner, MD, MSC |
In my prior experience, most health systems still define value in monetary terms without relation to patient outcomes. Operational measures are considered to the extent that they reflect efficiency and impact the bottom line (e.g., pre-noon discharges, LOS for a given MS-DRG, etc.). Population needs are rarely considered unless to identify a profitable untapped market. While the transition from FFS to capitated and other prospective payment mechanisms is well underway, health systems still focus on high margin services that tend to be procedural, regardless of value to the patient. For example, one health system was under-penetrated in spine surgery (i.e., lower market share in spine relative to their overall market share). From a finance perspective the estimated “loss” was ~$10M in margin annually, but the reason for the under-penetration was a robust PT and PM&R outpatient program that they had established to non-surgically manage many cases. This program reportedly yielded great patient outcomes, but no financial margin.
Additionally, a lot of current healthcare strategy still focuses on “payor mix optimization.” Given the vastly higher rates paid by commercial insurers relative to Medicare and Medicaid, health systems focus on several levers to improve their payor mix. This includes “aligning” physicians with favorable payor mix, improving their ambulatory footprint by building clinics and ambulatory surgery centers in wealthy suburbs, and investing in service lines with the highest proportion of commercial patients. These strategies can make a health system very profitable and are justified for the purposes of cross-subsidizing healthcare for Medicaid patients. However, the focus on competing for commercially insured patients only reinforces many of the healthcare disparities that exist and destroy value at a societal level.
There were several takeaways from this course that will impact my career. 1) You can be wildly successful with non-commercially insured patient populations through customer segmentation and wrap-around services (e.g., Oak Street). 2) Payor-mix optimization doesn’t have to be the end-all of healthcare strategy. Effective deployment of a network strategy that maximizes optimal site-of-care (e.g., CHOP), integrated practice units organized around diseases (e.g., Cleveland Clinic), and patient-centered outcomes (e.g., Martini Klinik) can all be used to improve value in terms of margin as well as patient outcomes while remaining agnostic to payor mix. 3) Bundled payments are an ongoing improvement project. Although early efforts have been underwhelming, a sustainable competitive advantage can be built by being the first in market to perfect bundled payments for an ever-growing range of high-volume services (e.g., New England Baptist).
Learning beyond the patient encounter
Doors to the Emergency Room |
This course reaffirmed my interest in learning more about models that
are efficient, well rounded, and equitable. I am very interested to continue to
learn and apply what I have learned thus far.
I think that more trainees should take this course because as physicians
we are always focused on the art of medicine, but we also have the right and
privilege to engage in the delivery in the care of our patients.
Valuable Lessons in Value-Based Healthcare Delivery
Frances Y. Hu, MD, MSc |
I particularly enjoyed the small group discussions when we were asked to consider the frustrations we encountered as clinical providers across Mass General Brigham and brainstorm solutions to better integrate patient care and increase value within our own healthcare system. Hearing from trainees in a variety of specialties drew attention to opportunities for improvement we had in common and emphasized the benefits to multidisciplinary efforts in improving care delivery. Overall, the course offers a more comprehensive understanding of the contrasting perspectives of various stakeholders in the healthcare system and allows trainees more awareness of strategies to align value with patient care.
Learning to view healthcare in a bigger picture.
Empowering the Next Generation of Healthcare Leaders.
Administrative Fellow
Massachusetts General Hospital
Reading for the Course |
As an Administrative Fellow, I felt empowered leaving this course to seek opportunities to lead TDABC initiatives in future administrative and leadership roles. I am still surprised by the notion that we as a healthcare industry do not comprehensively know our actual costs. I now view healthcare costs and finance in an entirely new lens. Additionally, this class is a great way to step outside of work mode and focus on learning through insightful discussion with colleagues in different corners of our health system. For me personally, this was a great opportunity to connect with young physician careerists, understand each other’s perspectives, and put our minds together to discuss these emerging trends in healthcare. I realized that our clinical and administrative backgrounds have real opportunity to learn from each other, to collaborate, and to passionately drive the future of value-based care. Ultimately, I encourage future clinical and administrative colleagues to take this course, continue to seek learning opportunities, and work together to drive value.
To Improve, It Must Be Measured!
Amar Deshwar, M.D. |