James C. Etheridge, M.D.
Resident in General Surgery
Brigham and Women's Hospital
PGY 3
06/02/2021
|
James C. Etheridge, M.D. |
The benefits of standardized care processes are
well-established. Clinical pathways and
protocols, when properly implemented, have been shown to improve adherence to
evidence-based practices, efficiency of healthcare, and patient outcomes. Enhanced recovery pathways, for example, have
been enormously successful in surgery.
However, the benefits of these approaches are seldom explored from a
value perspective. As such, the Value
Based Healthcare Delivery Course helped me to see these approaches in a new
light.
Standardized care processes tend to be discussed from a
“high-reliability” perspective. The argument
is logical and reasonable: if we can ensure timely adherence to evidence-based
practices, patients will do better and leave the hospital sooner. There is a tacit emphasis on process measures
from this perspective – outcomes are frequently presumed to follow improved
process adherence. The only element of
value routinely explored is the denominator, most commonly in terms of length
of stay.
Certainly, there is a benefit to improving best-practice
adherence and streamlining care. From a
value perspective, however, these process-oriented advantages are
secondary. Standardized care practices
are, rather, a prerequisite to value-based healthcare delivery. A health system has no way to assess the
costs of care processes and the return on investment for these processes
without standardization.
Consider a patient with uncomplicated appendicitis. A system with a systematic approach to care
delivery will be able to predict the choice of antibiotics, operative or
non-operative management, surgical devices used, and postoperative care
provided. With this data, the system can
anticipate costs and likely outcomes.
Process improvements to reduce costs or improve outcomes can be made and
studied with confidence. A system comprising
a conglomeration of individual providers, lacking standardized approaches to
patient care, can do none of these things. Failure to standardize thus does not simply
promote errors – it prohibits the functions necessary to a well-designed,
value-based healthcare delivery system.
This realization was one of many insights I gleaned from the
Value-Based Healthcare Delivery Course.
Sessions on costing methods, organization of care around common
conditions or organ systems, and rationalization of increasingly consolidated
healthcare systems were thought provoking and stimulating. Nonetheless, as an implementation researcher
with an interest in care standardization, I found this realization
profound. I am thankful for this
opportunity to refocus my efforts from processes and outcomes to value.